Thursday, 25 October 2012

WHO THREW KENYA UNDER THE BUS???


Once upon a time a Kenyan man named Kenyatta was accused of participating in treason against the country. He could claim, with considerable justice, that his arrest and ultimate detention was fabricated, that he had in fact done a lot to emancipate, emasculate and empower his county from colonialists. Nonetheless, the public understandably wanted to know both how much he loved the country  and what vision he had for the country; he obliged by releasing extensive information about his struggle for independence.
But that was 50 years ago. And the contrast between Jomo Kenyatta and his son Uhuru — a contrast both in their political careers and in their willingness to come clean about their crimes — dramatically illustrates how the Kenyan political landscape has changed.
Right now there’s a lot of ruffled feathers and buzz about the visit by the ICC Chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, who is leading prosecutions against the younger Kenyatta who has been accused of heinous crimes against humanity. Let’s talk about what it meant to be charged with a criminal offence during Jomo Kenyatta’s Kenya, and how it compares with the situation today.
Which ‘crimes’ did Jomo Kenyatta commit? The answer is a no-brainer: he was indicted with five others on the charges of ‘managing and being a member’ of the Mau Mau society which was a radical anti-colonial movement. The defense, led by British barrister D.N Pritt, argued that the white settlers were trying to scapegoat Kenyatta and that there was no evidence tying him to the Mau Mau.
While contemporary opinion linked Kenyatta with the Mau Mau, historians have questioned his alleged leadership of the freedom movement. At a time when Dedan Kimathi, General China and the other Mau Mau fighters were busy waging guerilla war against the colonial government in the forest, he was busy marrying the daughters of colonial chief’s.  This fact is also attested by his dismissal and scant treatment of Mau Mau fighters after he came to power coupled with the fact that after independence his allies were mainly former colonial collaborators. Was he a project and stooge of the British colonialists? Was he a bootlicker? Was he a turncoat revolutionary?
Upon his ascendency to power he pursued a moderate pro-western, anti-communist economic philosophy and foreign policy. He helped stabilize Kenya with the help of the British but his reign was bequeathed with a score of myriad litanies which continue to haunt our country and threaten our existence as a people.
Kenyatta ruled with an iron fist. He made himself rich amassing large tracts of land; encouraged the culture of wealth accumulation by public officials using the power and influence of their offices; unfairly resettled his kikuyu tribesmen in rift-valley province.
And he fought very gallantly to consolidate his position by amending the constitution to expand his executive powers thus ruling through a clique of his relatives who plundered the country’s resources to become the most powerful and wealthiest. It is this clique that has been blocking reforms, change and ultimate liberation of the country in order to continue bleeding the country to death.
I may not have the brains of Archimedes or Pythagoras but I can’t fail to figure out that 1 + 1=2. The candidature of the younger Kenyatta is that of self-preservation and maintaining of the statuesque. My gut feeling is that Uhuru is keener on protecting his fathers’ name and wealth than acknowledging his failed policies. Surely nobody expects him to bite the hand that fed him by reprimanding the unbridled atrocities committed by his father. Is he scoring an own goal when he says that he will address historical injustices mostly land alienation? Yet he is the major beneficiary. My crystal ball tells me that Uhuru will govern the same way his father did and go even a step further, that’s my clairvoyance.
The rich vultures are circling in on Uhuru’s candidature to protect the haves from the have-nots...most of the Kenyan people. He is on record suggesting that the charges of crimes against humanity he is facing at the ICC are politically instigated by western forces, is that really true?  My cue, it’s not my call; its Bensouda’s and the ICC’s… May justice be served.
The main thing that we have to worry about with a potential President Uhuru is that Uhuru seems to have almost a psychopathic obsession with accumulating money. It's like he's some kind of addict, chasing quarters in the gutter. All the offshore accounts; the bizarrely 80 million lost in a briefcase at the airport which he had withdrawn from his Swiss accounts fearing that they might frozen. That’s just the icing on the cake. The infamous kshs. 10 billion budget error, it’s one thing to flip flop about the ICC but attributing a budget that is scrutinized by top ministry of finance technocrats to a computer error is sheer malice and taking Kenyans for imbeciles. To add salt to injury, that same year it emerged that the ministry of finance had under reported the tax collected by KRA by kshs. 105 billion, KRA backed this by showing records of what it had collected the previous year and remittances to the finance ministry. Uhuru has remained tight lipped up to now and the issue still leaves black holes. It is also in the public gallery that uhuru necessitated the transfer of Prof. Sam Ongeri from the ministry of Education to that of Foreign Affairs after Ongeri confronted him about the ksh4.6 billion which disappeared before reaching the ministry of Education. What about the errors amounting to kshs. 89 billion cited by mars group?
What are his track records? Where are his priorities? What does he envision and present? Is he really the change we want? Is he a re-incarnation of Jomo?  I have no doubt that he would sell out this country in a heartbeat if he could barter it for a few dollars more.
Uhuru has taught Kenyans a viable lesson the hard way; that life isn’t about waiting for the storm to pass but learning to dance in the rain. Any middle-class Kenyan who votes for this nice but dishonest multi-millionaire votes against their own interest. And that's the truth!


Thursday, 2 August 2012

An Assassination Plot in Kenya


Could there be a plot by a section of the political class to ensure that the constitution is assassinated and buried deep before it could become operational. Mutilation is not the word to use here that is already done and Kenyans are getting used to it.


A few days ago Presidential aspirant Martha Karua alleged that there was a plot to move elections date to August 2013, then I could not imagine of such a possibility since such legislation by parliament to move elections to August 2013 Kenyans would prompt a revolt given the level of freedom of expression enjoyed in the country. Then came the IEBC tender saga on biometric voter registration kits, this creates a scenery where Kenyans could endorse the date themselves as ours politicians sit back and watch, given Kenyans would sacrifice anything even buying time to see a peaceful election.


This got me thinking could such happening be political plots stage managed to suit political interests? Could there be a systematic plan to rip off Wanjiku the gains made through the new constitution? While chatting with a friend deeply involved party politics, a prominent party I may say, with higher chances forming the next government.
He made an spat which I disregard as misplaced school of thought, he retorted " Wakenya wana jienjoy hata hizi county government can’t work wait next year we will have to revert to the old system". I have always felt that devolution was one of the best gifts of the new constitution to Kenyans.


The prediction and possible manipulation of election date to suit political interests got me worried, could these same minds be plotting to stop devolution once they clinch into power? What else do they have in store not in the public knowledge? Kenyans need to be vigilant or else the son they labored and heavily invested in to through their cash (read tax), time and also psychologically giving them the only hope for a brighter future might be assassinated even before he learns how to walk.





Sunday, 22 July 2012

G7's WATER PISTOL


The G7 politicians are tut-tutting about the recent campaign focus by Prime Minister Raila Odinga on his reform history — his record of fighting for the second liberation while the others went to bed with the oppressive regime, his mysterious was-he-or-wasn’t-he the main planner of the 1982 coup de tat, his equally mysterious turn around that Uhuru and Ruto should be allowed to vie for the presidency. Some of the tut-tutters are upset at any suggestion that this election is about the reformists versus the non-reformists. Others decry the personalization of the reform agenda: why can’t we just discuss change?

The new constitutional dispensation has put Kenya on the reform path, the country has gone from being dictatorial to being democratic; meanwhile, the new constitutional dispensation seeks to define the kind of leadership Kenyans can expect,  but not enough to offset the dark forces of impunity who are pro-statuesquo. As a nation, Kenya still needs a lot of reforms to see the changes we expect, thus we need a leader who is best suited to fully implement the constitution and safeguard reforms.

The bottom line in all this is that the G7 are firing blanks with their tut-tutting that the reform is a past thing and change is the in-thing to ensure transformation. If they decide to focus only on change!, what they’re basically doing is giving a cold shoulder to a myriad of issues bedeviling this country..

To put it nicely, “the G7 has an unloaded water pistol pointed at Raila’s head.” Actually, it’s even better: The G7 can, if it chooses, fire more shots at Raila’s reform agenda — but it’s a hot day, and he would actually enjoy it.

The fact that the G7 has had to go down into the mud to portray reform as a past thing and not needed now is a sad comment on the nature of politics. The G7 politicians are probably sincere about their calling to ‘the house on the hill’, but their alignment in the way of tribal alliances masquerading as political parties with the aim of stopping a particular individual, points to extremities within the alliance, thus producing a Frankenstein of contradictions on their ambiguous ‘change!’ message . In a better day, Kenyans wouldn’t be treated to the theatre of absurdity; we would hear intelligent discourse from both sides and vote in the best interests of the country.

So as I said, this election is, in substantive terms, about the reformists versus the rest, and it would be doing voters a disservice to pretend otherwise.

According to a book by one of my favorite authors; Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin, “change is a manifest marked distinction which ill men with ill designs, or weak men incapable of any designs, will constantly be embracing. It alters the substance of the objects themselves and gets rid of all their essential good whilst reform is a direct application of a remedy to the grievance complained of….”

The Kenyan people are hungrier for reformation not change. Whoever has a ‘real-loaded’ pistol will feed them and get their votes. The G7 should think about their capability of doing the former. They should take my advice; ditch the unloaded ‘water pistol’ and go get a loaded ‘pistol’, better than Mr. Odinga’s. The ball is in their court, the prerogative is theirs to let it gather no moss.

 Bam! Bam! Bam! It should fire!


Wednesday, 11 July 2012

Churchill Ndambuki a.k.a Mwalimu King’ang’i goes mad

Churchill Ndambuki  a.k.a Mwalimu King’ang’i goes mad
And it’s a beautiful thing to see.


Today strictly campus once again goes after the Big Lie — the claim by the Entertainment Director,  that Churchill snubbed the ‘Churchill Live Show’ in chep for a better paying one in coast — and drives home the point that the people advancing this story aren’t just tricksters but are acting with intent, engaged in deliberate deception and grand larceny.


In Makale’s and his co-conspirators adverts; posted on 'STRICTLY CAMPUS' timeline back on 26th June, thanks to technology we can even trace time, 6:31pm it read: "wow.... Churchill Live show happenin live at chep....(University of Eldoret to be) meet Eric Omondi, Fred Omondi and Churchill among other Live at chep....advance tickets goin on sale, 29th june....."


"for easy advance ticket za Churchill Live, u can get them from E17, or call 0715209012, the tickets r limted n almost done, hurry" posted on 28th june 5:26am.

Makale started harvesting fruits from the low-hanging branches as praises from the first years started flowing towards the entertainment director 'Makale' for pulling such a big gig, the students (first years) welcomed the events timing given they were winding up their end semester exams, not knowing the intrigues and power play in campus. However on a popular campus political group "Campus online Kamukunji" comrades questioned the eligibility of the event and whether it was not a PR gimmick to attract people. The entertainment director,

Makale, moved stealthily to put the comrades fear to rest by confirming that the event was indeed there and it was not a façade, as he had already agreed ‘terms and conditions’ with Churchill. On the D-day of the event, ‘kalahary Ibz makale’ (paul makale’s fb name) posted on campus online urging comrades to avail themselves and have a fun-filled Saturday with rib-tickling entertainment.


It was after ….( what happened )….. Excuses started being given on why the event failed. There was no official communication about the event, as comrades demanded for a refund of their money. Posts surfaced online on what happened, with blame being pointed from different quarters to Churchill and to the organizers.

This is what Melvin Wawire posted on strictly campus “wase tulieni.....c mnajua tu churchil hua msee wa maringo...he had confermed anakam then at around 7:00 pm akadinda tena juu he got a phone call from a certain rich fela in malindi ,so he weighed the amounts and decided on what he decided ,so makale shuldn’t be blamed he tried wat he cud ....kwa hio hasira there is another function on sato en he’s yet to decide on hu shud kam ....so chil out guyz.”

One Billyyegon Rotich Retorted “you are a liar! Churchill was in kitwek nyt n he didn't perform. He's looking for this culprits no. so that he can take a necessary action, inbox me the contacts of whoever claims he had organized the function in conjunction with Churchill” Others seemed to be part of the ‘makales organizing committee’; Billyyegon Rotich ‎ quipped “@Teddy nipe no ya hawa vulturesTeddy Courage: “Ni wa2 wangu usiwaite vltres...veev thot so!” Teddy Courage seemed to know the organizers asking them to be spared.

The man on of the moment, Makale, remained silent all through and adapted a favorite tactic, the ostrich philosophy: He took victory laps whenever comments casting churchill in a bad light, and glorifying him were posted in ‘campus online’. All you could see after such comments was ‘kalahary ibz makale likes this!’ His intellectual dishonesty was now on vivid display.
The discussion going on online on the scandal isn’t just a case where different people look at the same facts but reach different conclusions. Instead, we’re looking at a situation in which one side of the debate just isn’t interested in the truth, in which alleged ‘Churchill snub’ is actually just a propaganda.

Comrades Calls for Makale to speak up, of course, gets them declared “shrill”, denounced as partisan and getting personal; comrades are supposed to pretend that we’re having a civilized discussion between the organizers with good intentions, as if the mendacity were equal on both sides. Sorry, but it isn’t. Makale isn’t an angel; he is human and sometimes corrupt — but he does operate a lie machine 24/7

Comrades managed to reach Churchill upon their disappointment. Look at this tweet by Churchill® “@MwalimuChurchill  @KevynnYusuf “…you know yusuf, its you guyz who told me about that event...not the ones who organised it”.

CSP contacted Laugh Industry and they had this to say ……(from email)…..

Mail reply from laugh industry >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear sir, madam

This is to inform you that laugh industry has not in the recent past engaged Churchill in any event outside Nairobi. All laugh industry events are usually publicized via legal media namely, National newspaper, classic 105, KISS 100 and Mwalimu Kingangi Facebook page. However we will appreciate if you can kindly give us in confidence the information on who were the organizers of the said event and where it was so that we can take legal action against them.if you can get their contacts please forward to this email address so as to take appropriate action. Please feel free to share the above to any parties concerned because we are not responsible for organization, planning and execution of that event.

Yours sincerely
Robert Ocham
Laugh industry >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The Students Governing Council (CUCSO) only response came from the sports director Kennedy Urudi, who while addressing an issue on a departed comrade, among other things, pooh-poohs concerns that cucso is just covering its ears and yelling “La, la, la, we can’t hear you.” Urudi weasels a bit, but basically conveys the impression that a culture of corruption has returned like a malignant tumor and it must be stamped out. he quips

hi guyz, my sincere condolences to the family, relatives and friends of Dickson Ireri and the entire chep community, R.I.P DICKY. 2nd is about the Churchil Live issue. I managed to reach him and this is what he sent me on my inbox and I quote " we are also looking out for whoever organised the event and take necessary actions. I learnt of this event on facebook and twitter, and only because I was being asked if I will be there...if you have contacts of the organisers please let me know here...in future any event that I attend must be organised by or in conjuction with Laugh Industry & will definately be on media everywhere!...ni muhimu watu wajue hivyo!!...but otherwise poleni for the dissapointment caused by them...nitakuja tukijipanga hivi karibuni"”

Churchill has threatened legal action, will Paul Makale, scion of the SGC, take a legal bullet, acknowledging in court that, yes, yes, he falsely used Churchill’s name to solicit for money. His affect — silence and resilience — suggests he might have expected worse. And this week, the curtain rises on an impersonation and extortion trial. It might appear a strictly Off ‘River road’ production, as CSP has ensnared a couple of obscure operatives who were part of the organizing committee and have volunteered information, Important details are shadowed in pretrial murk.

But the trial is tantalizing for where its tentacles extend — linking corruption in the SGC, and touching on the curious fashion in which the ‘directors’ pursue their chosen game.

Story compiled and written by the CSP investigative team. We will soon be releasing more on this…

Monday, 9 July 2012

About Us



CSP was established to promote student journalism. It aims to promote the values of frankness, fearlessness and impartiality in the course of dissemination of information. Get to know all that is happening around you, the social scenes, the political scene & the economic scene.




Publishers of The-Bridge-Magazine Now on its second Issue